In today’s digital age, accessing a universe of music is easier than ever, thanks to the plethora of Music Services available. Most of these platforms boast libraries exceeding 100 million tracks, offering a seemingly endless selection of tunes. With such vast catalogs, the real battleground for these services isn’t just about quantity, but the unique features and user experiences they provide.
Some music services attempt to be all-encompassing, packing in every imaginable feature, often sacrificing quality and reliability in the process. Others take a minimalist approach, focusing on core functionalities and ensuring they work flawlessly. While each service tries to carve out its niche, feature borrowing is rampant, leading to a landscape where true differentiation can be challenging.
This exploration will delve into the distinct characteristics of some prominent music services, highlighting their unique offerings and, perhaps more importantly, questioning the necessity of certain features in the ever-evolving world of digital music.
Music streaming service platform
Spotify: The King of Scale and Connectivity in Music Services
When discussing music services, Spotify invariably takes center stage. The often-cited standout feature, Spotify Connect, is undeniably a major draw. Its seamless multi-device control is a significant reason many users remain loyal.
However, Spotify’s true strength lies in its sheer size and market dominance. This scale allows Spotify to weather feature gaps that would cripple smaller music services. Its immense music catalog is virtually unmatched, ensuring users rarely encounter unavailable tracks compared to other platforms.
Spotify’s delayed entry into lossless audio and its absence of Spatial Audio/Dolby Atmos support haven’t significantly deterred its massive user base. Similarly, the integration of podcasts and audiobooks into the core music service app, while debated, hasn’t sparked widespread exodus.
Spotify Connect, combined with its robust social features and generally effective playlist algorithms, solidifies user loyalty. While playlist curation quality can be subjective, the Spotify app itself is known for its speed and widespread availability. Its cross-platform compatibility is exceptional – if a device can produce sound, chances are it can play Spotify.
Yet, Spotify’s diversification beyond pure music is a double-edged sword. The all-in-one app approach, encompassing podcasts and audiobooks, dilutes the core music service experience for some. For users primarily seeking a dedicated music platform, this feature bloat can be unwelcome. The desire for a music-only Spotify app, or at least the option to disable non-music content, is a recurring user sentiment, especially considering recent price increases that haven’t been matched by improvements in core audio quality. In fact, Spotify’s subjective sound quality is now arguably lagging behind competitors like YouTube Music and Apple Music, particularly when those services are set to their high-quality audio settings.
Apple Music: The Well-Rounded Contender in the Music Services Arena
For users deeply embedded in the Apple ecosystem, Apple Music is often the natural choice among music services. However, its appeal extends beyond ecosystem lock-in.
Apple Music presents itself as a remarkably well-rounded music service, albeit with its own set of quirks. These quirks, while potentially minor for some, can be significant pain points for others, even deal-breakers.
Apple Music spearheaded the mainstream adoption of lossless audio and immersive sound formats like Dolby Atmos/Spatial Audio. It operates ad-free (though lacks a free tier) and boasts best-in-class, beat-synced lyrics and a vast, unparalleled collection of animated album art. Mirroring Spotify, Apple Music’s catalog is extensive, catering to virtually any musical taste.
A notable advantage of this music service is its handling of local files. Users can upload their own music, and Apple Music attempts to match them with its catalog. Unmatched files are uploaded as “high quality” 256 kbps AAC copies. Unlike Spotify, these local files sync across devices running the Apple Music app via cloud storage.
Apple Music’s curated playlists are generally well-received, and its radio stations, particularly Discovery Radio, are effective tools for music discovery. Furthermore, the service offers music videos and a robust library management system.
For serious music enthusiasts, Apple Music and Spotify are typically the only music services guaranteed to support pre-saves and adds for upcoming releases, both through artist-provided links and in-app searches. Other services often only feature singles until an album’s official release.
The primary drawback of Apple Music lies in its limited platform availability and the subpar quality of its desktop apps, particularly on Windows. Unlike Spotify’s near-ubiquitous presence, Apple Music’s reach is confined to major platforms like Windows, Android, PS5, and select smart speakers. Users outside these ecosystems are relegated to a less-than-ideal web-based experience. The overall Apple Music experience, especially for those not fully immersed in the Apple ecosystem, can be inconsistent across different platforms.
YouTube Music: The Community-Driven and Expansive Music Service
YouTube Music distinguishes itself from other music services by integrating a community-driven element. Beyond the standard music library, it taps into the vast content of YouTube itself. This unique approach makes remixes, live versions, and unofficial edits readily accessible.
While direct personal experience with YouTube Music may be limited for some, user feedback is generally positive, with few major downsides reported. Past frustrations primarily stemmed from the transition from Google Play Music to the YouTube Music branding.
The core strength of this music service is its YouTube integration. This connection unlocks a significantly larger music library, eliminating the need to manually rip and convert YouTube videos for offline listening, a workaround often necessary with other platforms. With YouTube Music, this vast and diverse musical landscape is directly integrated.
Deezer: A Music Service Searching for its Identity
Deezer occupies a somewhat ambiguous space in the music services market. Its user base appears relatively niche, and its target audience isn’t immediately clear.
The service’s continued support for the outdated 360 Reality Audio platform, while most modern services embrace Dolby Atmos (or both), is perplexing. Device compatibility for 360 Reality Audio is limited, suggesting a need to prioritize more widely adopted immersive audio technologies like Dolby Atmos.
Deezer offers CD-quality lossless audio but stops short of higher-resolution options. This positioning may alienate audiophiles who prioritize superior sound quality.
Similar to Apple Music, Deezer allows local file uploads, but with a significant limitation: files must be converted to MP3. While Apple Music’s lossless local file support also has format restrictions (ALAC or AIFF), Deezer’s MP3-only approach is surprisingly restrictive in today’s landscape.
The primary rationale for choosing Deezer among music services might be price, if it offers a more competitive subscription cost in certain regions. However, its unique selling proposition and overall appeal remain unclear compared to more focused competitors.
Amazon Music: The Music Service Tied to the Amazon Ecosystem
Amazon Music shares similarities with Deezer in terms of market positioning. For many users, its presence is primarily linked to an Amazon Prime membership bundle rather than a standalone music service of choice.
Personal experiences with Amazon Music, even with free trial periods, often highlight a consistently underwhelming app experience.
While voice control via Alexa might mitigate app usability issues for some, relying heavily on voice assistants for music streaming is not universally preferred.
Furthermore, Amazon Music exhibits a closed ecosystem approach, particularly regarding playlist and library portability. Even Apple Music offers better library transfer options. Services like Soundiiz struggle with Amazon Music integration, and the platform generally lacks interoperability with other services.
Despite app and ecosystem limitations, Amazon Music boasts a large catalog, leveraging Amazon’s long history in digital music sales. Its library size rivals Spotify and Apple Music, ensuring a wide selection of content.
A once-notable feature, the digital music locker for storing and integrating local files, has been discontinued for approximately five years.
Unless deeply invested in the Amazon ecosystem, opting for alternative music services with more user-friendly apps and open ecosystems is generally advisable.
Tidal: The Audiophile-Focused Music Service with Integration Strengths
Tidal is positioned as a preferred music service for audiophiles. While aiming to compete with Spotify in features, Tidal Connect, while functional, isn’t as seamless as Spotify’s version. Tidal supports animated album art, lyrics, and music videos, but refining the user experience across these features remains an area for improvement.
Tidal’s app ecosystem is somewhat uneven. Core apps for phones, tablets, and desktops are well-developed, but apps for other platforms appear less maintained. The TV app concept, prioritizing music videos, can be limiting for users primarily interested in library playback.
Tidal’s strength lies in its third-party integrations, notably its compatibility with Roon. This integration allows users to bypass Tidal’s native app in favor of Roon’s interface. Tidal also integrates well with Plex and Plexamp for users within those ecosystems.
While Tidal Connect works with a range of music streamers, DACs, and receivers, its support for modern “smart” devices like speakers, TVs, and watches is less comprehensive than Spotify’s. However, Tidal’s core focus on the audiophile market remains a key differentiator.
The primary drawback of this music service is its music catalog, which, while improving, is smaller than those of Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, and YouTube Music. Users may occasionally encounter missing tracks requiring local file imports.
Unless audiophile features or third-party integrations are primary concerns, Spotify, Apple Music, or YouTube Music may offer a more broadly appealing experience.
Qobuz: The Niche Audiophile Music Service
Qobuz is often considered the leading music service for audiophiles, frequently presented as a direct alternative to Tidal. However, its appeal is arguably narrower, primarily resonating with listeners of jazz and classical music.
Qobuz excels in sound quality and boasts a visually appealing interface. However, its apps are often criticized for being buggy and lacking features found in more mainstream music services. Its integration with Roon is a plus for audiophile setups.
Despite its sonic strengths, Qobuz’s limited catalog is a significant drawback. It has the smallest library among major music services, with inconsistent album availability, even for mainstream artists. This inconsistency can be frustrating, with seemingly arbitrary gaps in artists’ discographies.
While a trial of Qobuz is recommended to experience its superior sound quality, its app limitations and smaller library may deter many users from long-term subscription, particularly given its limited platform support (currently phones, tablets, and computers only). Qobuz Connect is anticipated but not yet available.
Despite its audiophile focus, Qobuz lags behind in app features and library size, making it a less compelling option for a broad audience.
The Landscape of Music Services: A Continuous Evolution
Beyond these highlighted music services, many others exist, but lack distinct features to differentiate themselves in a meaningful way.
The music streaming landscape is ripe for further innovation. App development needs to prioritize user experience and address existing shortcomings across various platforms. Currently, no single “perfect” music service exists; each has its own set of strengths and weaknesses, whether in features or music catalog depth.
Even for dedicated users, long-term platform loyalty isn’t guaranteed. The music services market is dynamic, and continued evolution is expected.
For now, a combination of Tidal, Roon, and local file libraries represents a preferred setup for some audiophiles. However, the hope remains that larger players like Spotify, Apple Music, or YouTube Music will enhance their offerings to better cater to audiophiles, potentially leading to platform shifts in the future.
The reality of music services is that they operate within a popularity-driven ecosystem. Artists often prioritize major platforms for exclusive releases and content, which then may trickle down to services like Tidal, but exclusivity remains heavily skewed towards the largest platforms.
Peter’s Audio Journal is a reader-supported publication. To receive alerts about new content and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
